| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: do {} while (0) nitpick |
| Date: | 2020-05-04 22:44:14 |
| Message-ID: | 39dee4bf-9085-b7b0-116d-212b0da0199a@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/1/20 5:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> There are remaining instances of this antipattern in the flex-generated
> scanners, which we can't do anything about; and in pl/plperl/ppport.h,
> which we shouldn't do anything about because that's upstream-generated
> code. (I wonder though if there's a newer version available.)
I'll take a look. It's more than 10 years since we updated it.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-05-04 22:49:57 | Re: [REPORT] Static analys warnings |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-04 22:39:30 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |