| From: | Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Clarifying/rationalizing Vars' varno/varattno/varnoold/varoattno |
| Date: | 2021-12-22 17:01:22 |
| Message-ID: | 39d9f8f2-19bb-c9f2-572e-06694fe9b829@postgrespro.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22/12/2021 20:42, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
>> On 5/2/2020 01:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I've not written any actual code, but am close to being ready to.
>
>> This thread gives us hope to get started on solving some of the basic
>> planner problems.
>> But there is no activity for a long time, as I see. Have You tried to
>> implement this idea? Is it actual now?
>
> It's been on the back burner for awhile :-(. I've not forgotten
> about it though.
I would try to develop this feature. Idea is clear for me, but
definition of the NullableVars structure is not obvious. Maybe you can
prepare a sketch of this struct or you already have some draft code?
--
regards,
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-12-22 17:50:49 | Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-12-22 16:36:12 | Re: pg_upgrade should truncate/remove its logs before running |