| From: | "Poul L(dot) Christiansen" <poulc(at)cs(dot)auc(dot)dk> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "Gary Howland (During daytime)" <gary-daytime(at)hotlava(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: True ACID under linux (no fsync)? | 
| Date: | 2000-10-31 16:50:07 | 
| Message-ID: | 39FEF83F.4078110A@cs.auc.dk | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
Strange.
I did a test on Redhat Linux 7.0 with fsync() turned off and my
batchfile of inserts ran 10 times as fast. But that was on an slow PC
with a slow IDE harddrive.
What Linux distribution and kernel version are you running?
Poul L. Christiansen
"Gary Howland (During daytime)" wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just a quickie - I heard that linux does not have a working fsync() call
> (it has no concept of raw devices).  In other words, fsync cannot be used
> to ensure that data is on disk (try it with a floppy - it returns IMMEDIATELY!!! - long before the write finishes)
> 
> This is for ALL linuxes.
> 
> Does this mean that postgres is unrealiable (or non ACID-conforming) under linux?
> 
> Gary
> 
> --
> Friends help you move.
> Real friends help you move bodies.
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> 
> Free Unlimited Internet Access! Try it now!
> http://www.zdnet.com/downloads/altavista/index.html
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Wolfe | 2000-10-31 17:36:22 | Re: True ACID under linux (no fsync)? | 
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-31 16:37:50 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |