Re: AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use
Date: 2000-10-24 10:05:51
Message-ID: 39F55EFF.4D9A022F@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:

[snip]

>
> Also the result would be, that the first readonly statements are allowed to
> see schema changes, but selects after the first DML would not :-(
>

Does it mean that even read-only statements aren't allowed
to release locks after other DMLs ?

Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-10-24 10:15:52 AW: AW: AW: BLERe: AW: AW: relation ### modified while in use
Previous Message Vadim B. Mikheev - CVS 2000-10-24 09:56:09 pgsql/src/backend/access/transam (xact.c xlog.c xlogutils.c)