From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: pg_dump docs |
Date: | 2000-10-20 02:15:56 |
Message-ID: | 39EFAADC.565BDA53@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > > > I don't see a reference from the developer's corner web page, which
> > > > seems to point back to the released version instead.
> > > That's strange... I see it :) ...now
> >
> > Great! But I don't, maybe due to caching somewhere? Should I be seeing
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/
> > -> Current documentation
> >
> > pointing at
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/index.html
> >
> > (afaik this index.html does not yet exist, but could point to the
> > various flavors of pages and tarballs) rather than
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/index.html
> >
> > which is what I see now?
>
> I thought /docs/index.html was to be for the current docs. Since they're
> not, what ARE they pointing to?? Anyway, I've now got it pointing to
> devel-contrib/docs/index.html and created an index. If you ever need to
> update the index, look at the script makeindex in that directory.
docs/index.html *are* the "current docs". They correspond to the current
released version, which would be 7.0.x (though it is possible that no
one updated them for 7.0.2).
For developers (-hackers developers, not application developers using
the current release), the "current docs" correspond to the docs built
nightly (actually twice a day), which reflect the current development
tree.
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-10-20 02:43:52 | Re: pgsql/doc (FAQ_MSWIN INSTALL_MSWIN) |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2000-10-20 02:14:04 | Re: Re: pg_dump docs |