From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Vadim Mikheev <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: time stops within transaction |
Date: | 2000-10-19 23:52:14 |
Message-ID: | 39EF892E.99983A63@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Vadim Mikheev wrote:
> > I am inclined to think that we should do SetQuerySnapshot in the outer
> > loop of pg_exec_query_string, just before calling
> > pg_analyze_and_rewrite. This would ensure that parse/plan accesses to
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Actually not - snapshot is passed as parameter to heap_beginscan...
> And currently SnapshotNow is used everywhere.
>
I sometimes mentioned anxieties about the use of SnapshotNow,
though I 've had no reasonable solution for it.
SnapshotNow isn't a real snapshot and so it wouldn't be able to
give us a complete consistency e.g. in the case "DDL statements
in transaction block".
However I couldn't think of any reasnoable way how to
handle the following cases.
We would have PREPARE statements in the near future.
How does PREPARE use the same snapshot as the execution ?
We would never be able to have shared catalog cache.
We coulnd't delete dropped table files immediately after commit.
...
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-20 00:10:11 | Re: Rule system goes weird with SELECT queries |
Previous Message | Kevin O'Gorman | 2000-10-19 23:50:51 | Re: Rule system goes weird with SELECT queries |