From: | Herbert Liechti <Herbert(dot)Liechti(at)thinx(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | postgres <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: prefer (+) oracle notation |
Date: | 2000-10-19 22:24:47 |
Message-ID: | 39EF74AF.59ED468@thinx.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Edmar Wiggers" <edmar(at)brasmap(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm not sure about the standard, but I really like Oracle's notation for
> > foreign keys:
>
> > select a.item_number, b.group_code_description
> > from items a, group_codes b
> > where a.group_code = b.group_code (+);
>
> I beg to differ --- IMHO, Oracle's notation is brain dead.
I agree. In my opinion the best syntax for outer joins was brought up
by informix. Ex:
SELECT a.f1, b.f1, c.f1
FROM a, OUTER( b, OUTER c )
WHERE a.key = b.fkkey
AND b.key = c.fkkey
Where b is outer from a and c outer from b. Precedence and
hierachical order is given by the parenthesis. Same example
FROM a, OUTER ( b, c)
b and c are outer from a. I find this syntax clear and logic without
any danger of missinterpretation
Best regards
Herbie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Wolfe | 2000-10-19 22:25:50 | Re: Any risk in increasing BLCKSZ to get larger tuples? |
Previous Message | KuroiNeko | 2000-10-19 22:19:39 | RE: MySQL -> pgsql |