Re: prefer (+) oracle notation

From: Herbert Liechti <Herbert(dot)Liechti(at)thinx(dot)ch>
To: postgres <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: prefer (+) oracle notation
Date: 2000-10-19 22:24:47
Message-ID: 39EF74AF.59ED468@thinx.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Edmar Wiggers" <edmar(at)brasmap(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm not sure about the standard, but I really like Oracle's notation for
> > foreign keys:
>
> > select a.item_number, b.group_code_description
> > from items a, group_codes b
> > where a.group_code = b.group_code (+);
>
> I beg to differ --- IMHO, Oracle's notation is brain dead.

I agree. In my opinion the best syntax for outer joins was brought up
by informix. Ex:

SELECT a.f1, b.f1, c.f1
FROM a, OUTER( b, OUTER c )
WHERE a.key = b.fkkey
AND b.key = c.fkkey

Where b is outer from a and c outer from b. Precedence and
hierachical order is given by the parenthesis. Same example

FROM a, OUTER ( b, c)

b and c are outer from a. I find this syntax clear and logic without
any danger of missinterpretation

Best regards
Herbie

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Wolfe 2000-10-19 22:25:50 Re: Any risk in increasing BLCKSZ to get larger tuples?
Previous Message KuroiNeko 2000-10-19 22:19:39 RE: MySQL -> pgsql