Re: INHERITS doesn't offer enough functionality

From: Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: INHERITS doesn't offer enough functionality
Date: 2000-10-19 11:58:14
Message-ID: 39EEE1D6.F455FEF9@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

> > At the end of the day though, the reason is only performance. The
> > semantics should be the same no matter whether implemented as multiple
> > indexes or not. Performance is much better with one index though.(*)
> >
>
> Is it true ?
> How to guarantee the uniqueness using multiple indexes ?

Well you'd have to check every index in the hierarchy. As I said,
inefficient.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew 2000-10-19 12:15:14 RE: Postgre7.0.2 drop user bug
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-10-19 11:23:50 Re: time stops within transaction