| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)hub(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [SQL] Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2) |
| Date: | 2000-10-11 05:51:59 |
| Message-ID: | 39E3FFFF.3CA214B7@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports pgsql-sql |
> ... On top of that, I never quite figured out
> the alignment between the egcs and the gcc version numbers (i.e. how does
> egcs 1.1.2 relate to gcc 2.95.2?).
egcs-1.1.2 was internally labeled as 2.91.66.
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-10-11 17:13:30 | Re: [ PGSQL for WIN] |
| Previous Message | Ryan Kirkpatrick | 2000-10-11 04:41:11 | Re: [SQL] Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2) - solved |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2000-10-11 13:42:05 | Can I use subselect as a function parameter? |
| Previous Message | Ryan Kirkpatrick | 2000-10-11 04:41:11 | Re: [SQL] Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2) - solved |