Re: FYI - Build problems when an RPM version is installed

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FYI - Build problems when an RPM version is installed
Date: 2000-09-12 10:03:43
Message-ID: 39BDFF7F.3DDB68D7@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > It seems to be that HAVE_UNION_SEMUN is set by configure, because
> > it appears in the file /usr/include/pgsql/storage/ipc.h, which is
> > somehow included in the configure test. During the build process,
> > however, the RPM headers are, properly, not included. Moving
> > /usr/include/pgsql to /tmp allows for the build to take place, so
> > no harm no foul. I'm not sure if this is a problem or not, but
> > its nice to be able to run snapshots on the same machine as
> > RPM-based production versions for development.
>
> Hmm. I've been building in the same kind of environment (7.0.2 RPMs
> installed; cvs snapshot in my home directory) and do not see this
> symptom. I did a "make distclean" this evening so had a fairly fresh
> start.
>
> btw, I had to blow away all of my installation area to get things to
> initdb this evening. Not sure what was not getting
> replaced/updated/removed by the normal installation process, but
> whatever it was led to core dumps when building the template database.
>
> - Thomas

Sorry. It looks like config.cache is being distributed with the
snapshot. I must have performed a make distclean after moving the
include directory and concluded incorrectly regarding the ipc.h
header.

Mike Mascari

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Mascari 2000-09-12 11:06:28 Weird function behavior from Sept 11 snapshot
Previous Message 'Alfred Perlstein' 2000-09-12 08:34:46 Re: bug with dropping tables and transactions.