| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)i4free(dot)co(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | brian(at)wuwei(dot)govshops(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE:7.1 Release date ( Actually 7.1 Upgrade ) |
| Date: | 2000-09-03 04:05:08 |
| Message-ID: | 39B1CDF4.7046DD1A@i4free.co.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Previously....
>Tom, I for one appreciate the fact that the developers would rather
spend
>their time working on features! Keep at it, everyone is doing a *great*
>job. Postgres is a joy to use.
>
>I don't really know what all the controversy is over here. Dumping your
>data before a version upgrade of your database is pretty standard
>procedure.
I would like to add my support for this point of view....
and keeping things in perspective observe that the pg_dump etc etc
process works, an attribute not to be always taken for granted ( some
databases I worked with not so long ago would silently corrupt your data
with their "upgrade" tools...)
my 2c
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2000-09-03 04:15:48 | WAL in 7.x ? |
| Previous Message | Ian Turner | 2000-09-03 01:18:22 | Re: [Solved] SQL Server to PostgreSQL |