| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jerome Raupach <jraupach(at)intelcom(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Optimization in C] |
| Date: | 2000-08-18 13:44:34 |
| Message-ID: | 399D3DC2.D9BB15B1@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
> This solution isn't good when there are +10000 tuples in the table, it's
> slowly... anybody can help me ? :
Someone already responded, and asked some questions about what you are
really trying to do. If you didn't get the message, let us know or check
the mail archives.
Regards.
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grembowicz, Kenneth | 2000-08-18 13:55:09 | VERY SLOW UPDATES |
| Previous Message | David Lloyd-Jones | 2000-08-18 11:25:06 | In Search of America |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Swan | 2000-08-18 13:51:36 | Re: ETA for 7.1 ? |
| Previous Message | Sevo Stille | 2000-08-18 13:25:12 | Re: VACUUM optimization ideas. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yury Don | 2000-08-18 14:07:11 | Re: sequences in functions |
| Previous Message | Graham Vickrage | 2000-08-18 12:24:15 | sequences in functions |