From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view |
Date: | 2020-06-20 00:39:13 |
Message-ID: | 399663b9-5fce-b41e-07e1-d9531af73a6c@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020/06/19 21:15, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 05:34:01PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On 2020/06/19 16:43, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>>> At Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:36:09 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote in
>>>> So we usually avoid to do that between betas, but my take here is that
>>>> a catalog bump is better than regretting a change we may have to live
>>>> with after the release is sealed.
>>
>> Sounds reasonable.
>
> If we want to make this happen, I am afraid that the time is short as
> beta2 is planned for next week. As the version will be likely tagged
> by Monday US time, it would be good to get this addressed within 48
> hours to give some room to the buildfarm to react. Attached is a
> straight-forward proposal of patch. Any thoughts?
It's better if we can do that. But I think that we should hear Alvaro's opinion
about this before rushing to push the patch. Even if we miss beta2 as the result
of that, I'm ok. We would be able to push something better into beta3.
So, CC Alvaro.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-06-20 01:18:55 | Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view |
Previous Message | Andy Fan | 2020-06-19 23:33:39 | Re: hash as an search key and hash collision |