Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> Btw, backpatching a change in the error infrastructure does not seem a
> good idea to me, as there could be applications that depend on the
> existing behaviors? It looks like we'd better just remove the
> assertion in back-branches.
+1. Not very sure what we want to change this to in HEAD, but
I wouldn't backpatch a behavioral change here.
regards, tom lane