Re: Regression tests failures on Windows Server 2019 - on master at commit # d816f366b

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regression tests failures on Windows Server 2019 - on master at commit # d816f366b
Date: 2022-03-04 21:51:32
Message-ID: 3983061.1646430692@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> That fixed the immediate problem, but dblink, postgres_fdw tests failed:
> +ERROR: could not establish connection
> +DETAIL: connection to server at "localhost" (::1), port 5432 failed: FATAL:
> role "SYSTEM" does not exist

[ scratches head... ] Where is libpq getting that username from?
Why is it different from whatever we'd determined during initdb?
(Maybe a case-folding issue??)

> The dblink and fdw failures can presumably be fixed by passing current_user as
> the username. That seems like a good idea anyway?

I don't think it's a good idea to hack that without understanding
why it's suddenly going wrong.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-03-04 21:56:57 Re: Regression tests failures on Windows Server 2019 - on master at commit # d816f366b
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-03-04 21:42:06 Re: Regression tests failures on Windows Server 2019 - on master at commit # d816f366b