From: | Merrill Oveson <merrill(at)actarg(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Kyle Bateman <kyle(at)actiontarget(dot)com> |
Subject: | unique constraint - bug? |
Date: | 2000-07-19 22:22:23 |
Message-ID: | 39762A1F.B5089BED@actiontarget.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
All:
Run the following script:
drop table letter;
create table letter (
a char(1),
b char(1),
c char(1),
unique (a, b, c)
);
insert into letter values('1','2','3');
insert into letter values('1','2','3');
insert into letter (a,c) values ('1','3');
insert into letter (a,c) values ('1','3');
Notice that the second insert of ('1','2','3') yields an error message,
which is the correct behavior - (that is the unique constaint is
working),
while the last insert of ('1','3') does not yield an error message -
(that is
the unique constraint doesn't work in this case - I think it should).
It appears as though the null value inserted for column b causes an
abrogation
of the unique constaint.
Is this intended or is it a bug?
Or should I be doing something different?
Thanks
Merrill
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Burton | 2000-07-19 22:50:24 | Re: Does CREATE FUNCTION... WITH (ISCACHABLE) work? |
Previous Message | Swaminathan R. Iyer | 2000-07-19 21:16:09 | Retrieving images from PG using Java |