Re: proposal sql: labeled function params

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: proposal sql: labeled function params
Date: 2008-08-23 16:15:05
Message-ID: 3976.1219508105@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I thing, so it's possible - in this case. We should transform named
> params to expr after syntax analyze.

You're going to have a hard time making parentheses affect the behavior
if you do it that way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-08-23 16:39:52 Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-08-23 16:12:57 Re: [GENERAL] Surprising syntax error