| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PORTS] Shared library search paths |
| Date: | 2000-07-19 01:52:10 |
| Message-ID: | 397509CA.C2B623B1@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
> Some platforms (OSF/cc, HPUX) are already using -rpath or equivalent, so
> you don't have to specify a shared library search path at runtime. I think
> that a lot more platforms could use this. Can people comment on whether
> and how it works on their platform? Essentially,
> LDFLAGS+=-rpath '$(libdir)'
For linux (at least gcc 2.7.x and 2.95.2 systems):
if specified in the compilation step,
-Wl,-rpath $(libdir)
or if specified directly to the linker
-rpath $(libdir)
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-07-19 03:52:02 | Re: MySQL comparison |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-07-19 01:48:33 | Re: [PORTS] Shared library search paths |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | luc00 | 2000-07-19 06:47:44 | self Installing Kit for win2000 ? |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-07-19 01:48:33 | Re: [PORTS] Shared library search paths |