Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?
Date: 2024-08-02 15:07:55
Message-ID: 3973586.1722611275@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> <dons flameproof suit>
> Hmmm, and then have "leakproof_mode" = strict/lax/off where 'strict' is
> current behavior, 'lax' allows the 'maybe's to get pushed down, and
> 'off' ignores the leakproof attribute entirely and pushes down anything
> that merits being pushed?
> </dons flameproof suit>

So in other words, we might as well just remove RLS.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2024-08-02 15:37:17 Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-08-02 14:14:52 Re: can we mark upper/lower/textlike functions leakproof?