| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/ oc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml oc/src/sgml/r ... |
| Date: | 2002-07-13 17:07:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3972.1026580072@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Is it at all a problem that several columns in pg_conversion have the same
> name as columns in pg_constraint?
> Should the ones in pg_conversion become: convname instead of conname, etc.
> simply for clarity?
Perhaps so. The two patches were developed independently and so no one
thought about it. I don't have a strong feeling about which set of
names to change, although perhaps pg_conversion is referenced in fewer
places at the moment.
Tatsuo, any opinions?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-13 19:20:34 | pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path indxpath.c |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-07-13 05:35:31 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/ oc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml oc/src/sgml/r ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-13 17:12:16 | Re: help needed with CREATE CONVERSION |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-13 17:03:55 | Re: Unique and Primary Key Constraints |