Re: Serious Performance Loss in 7.0.2??

From: Tim Perdue <tperdue(at)valinux(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: Serious Performance Loss in 7.0.2??
Date: 2000-07-12 19:05:53
Message-ID: 396CC191.FB042722@valinux.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> > As requested by "The Hermit Hacker", I took out the ORDER BY and it was
> > instantaneous.
>
> How long does it take to do
> SELECT count(*) FROM tbl_mail_archive WHERE fld_mail_list=35 AND
> fld_mail_year=2000 AND fld_mail_month=1
> ? That should tell us how much time is being spent in the indexscan.

It's pretty much instantaneous.

> Also, when you are doing the complete query with sort, does a
> pg_sorttemp file appear in the database directory? If so, how big does
> it get?

Doesn't look like it. There is a (supposedly) dead pg_sorttemp file in
that directory that is 74MB. Probably unrelated.

My only remaining question is whether an index on 4,000,000 datestamps
is going to be fast or not. Or how Long will my nightly vacuum run?
Forever?

Tim

--
Founder - PHPBuilder.com / Geocrawler.com
Lead Developer - SourceForge
VA Linux Systems
408-542-5723

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Howie 2000-07-12 19:09:18 Re: Slashdot discussion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-07-12 19:01:36 Re: AW: 7.0.2 issues / Geocrawler