From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Distribution making |
Date: | 2000-07-11 15:10:01 |
Message-ID: | 396B38C9.95E45199@wgcr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > > Is this something that can be 'extended' to do the RPM also? :)
> > Yes. Do you want that to happen? It won't be too hard -- the
> If this can be worked in along side/on top of what Peter is doing, I think
> that would be great ...
Well, it can be done. However, the RPM' have historically had a tighter
cycle than the official release -- We have 7.0.2-1 and -2 RPM's (soon to
be up to -6 or -7) a problems are found in the packaging. Of course, as
I try to synchronize things, maybe that cycle time can go away. :-)
Now, I know that, in the past, feature patches were released on
postgresql.org (as well as bugfix patches) that were inbetween releases
-- that could be done for the RPM stuff easily enough. But, I'd want
some comments from RPM distribution users before going that route.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-11 15:26:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Foreign key bugs (Re: "New" bug?? Serious - crashes backend.) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-11 15:03:30 | Re: postmaster errors with index on temp table? |