From: | Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | sql pgsql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Learning about WITH RECURSIVE |
Date: | 2009-11-04 22:17:00 |
Message-ID: | 396486430911041417o40cf1939k6ff703ca704a3e14@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Can anyone one explain why a "WITH RECURSIVE" query has the same
>> results regardless whether UNION or UNION ALL is specified?
>
> Well, if the rows are all different anyway, UNION isn't going to
> eliminate any ...
Okay thanks. I see that I need to spend more time with the on-line docs.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Broersma | 2009-11-04 22:27:14 | Re: Learning about WITH RECURSIVE |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-04 22:11:04 | Re: Learning about WITH RECURSIVE |