From: | "Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amber <guxiaobo1982(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result? |
Date: | 2008-09-09 15:17:33 |
Message-ID: | 396486430809090817n7b7cc3b5g21dd8ae0a0052c0f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Amber <guxiaobo1982(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, we don't care about the performance results, but we do care about the point that PostgreSQL can't give the correct results of TPC-H queries.
It would be nice to know about the data, queries, and the expected
results of their tests just so we could see this for ourselves.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2008-09-09 15:29:54 | Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result? |
Previous Message | Frederik Ramm | 2008-09-09 15:04:56 | Re: Various intermittent bugs/instability - how to debug? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2008-09-09 15:29:54 | Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result? |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2008-09-09 15:03:50 | Re: Intel's X25-M SSD |