| From: | "Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Michael Shulman" <shulman(at)mathcamp(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: inserting to a multi-table view |
| Date: | 2008-06-17 19:46:27 |
| Message-ID: | 396486430806171246h2f644057o6e9ff2c9954ed4db@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Michael Shulman <shulman(at)mathcamp(dot)org> wrote:
> Would it be possible to actually do something like this in an update
> rule? You couldn't write the "begin/commit", but it seems that you
> wouldn't need to either, since the UPDATE command invoking the rule
> will be wrapped in its own begin/commit (automatic or explicit).
Thats a good question. I've never tried it. and since then, I gotten
away from using update-able view. In my case, I like using Natural
Primary keys so update-able views wouldn't work for me any more. :o)
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2008-06-17 21:33:40 | Re: PostgreSQL and AMD? |
| Previous Message | Michael Shulman | 2008-06-17 19:34:55 | Re: inserting to a multi-table view |