From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | xinwen(at)stu(dot)scu(dot)edu(dot)cn, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17826: An assert failed in /src/backend/optimizer/util/var.c |
Date: | 2023-03-16 18:59:34 |
Message-ID: | 3962534.1678993174@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 10:43, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Ah, got it. So basically, the quals that we want are excluded by
>> check_output_expressions' point 4 (since they reference window
>> function output columns rather than partitioning columns). I think
>> we need them to satisfy every other property that's checked in this
>> code, though. Now I agree that we need to refactor a bit -- we
>> don't want to have to re-check all of these conditions.
> OK, patch attached.
This looks good to me. As a matter of style, I'd capitalize the
enum constant names, but I think it's OK otherwise.
> I probably need to do a bit more indenting work. I'll look again tomorrow.
Yeah, this looks like pgindent might not like it as-is.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-03-16 19:35:15 | Re: BUG #17847: Unaligned memory access in ltree_gist |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2023-03-16 18:00:01 | BUG #17847: Unaligned memory access in ltree_gist |