Re: Is this still true?

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is this still true?
Date: 2000-06-24 02:14:46
Message-ID: 39541996.434E34F4@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#4.23 Is this a leftover
> > from previous versions of postgres or is this still true for 7.0?
> >
>
> Still true in 7.0.

Gee. Shouldn't 4.24 use the advice above in 4.23?

I.E., shouldn't it read:

SELECT tab1.col1, tab2.col2
FROM tab1, tab2
WHERE tab1.col1 = tab2.col1
UNION ALL
SELECT tab1.col1, NULL
FROM tab1
WHERE tab1.col1 NOT EXISTS
(SELECT tab2.col1 FROM tab2 WHERE tab1.col1 = tab2.col1)
ORDER BY tab1.col1

Mike Mascari

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-24 02:48:53 Re: Is this still true?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-24 01:47:35 Re: Is this still true?