From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Lee Wu" <Lwu(at)mxlogic(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: table not shown |
Date: | 2004-06-15 19:18:13 |
Message-ID: | 3946.1087327093@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
"Lee Wu" <Lwu(at)mxlogic(dot)com> writes:
> Here is screen shot:
> mxl=# select * from pg_class where relname = 'mxl_quar_process';
> [ no rows ]
> mxl=# select * from mxl_quar_process limit 1;
> [ data ]
That's just plain bizarre.
I'm wondering about corruption of the indexes on pg_class --- though I'd
have expected the system to use an indexscan to look up mxl_quar_process
for the second select, so it's not obvious why the first search would
fail and the second one not.
Your later report about "invalid adnum value 5 for table mxl_user_wbl"
also sounds like it could be due to index corruption.
I'd try doing a REINDEX DATABASE to see if that fixes it. (Read the
REINDEX man page fully before you start.)
One other thought --- it doesn't change anything if you do
select * from pg_catalog.pg_class where relname = 'mxl_quar_process';
does it?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lee Wu | 2004-06-15 19:29:38 | Re: table not shown |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-06-15 19:02:21 | Re: table not shown |