Re: Updated ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE patch

Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> I vote for taking it out.

> Pull it. I added it intentionally but now I'm questioning my reasoning
> (which was, sequences might be accessed lots, people might want to put
> them somewhere intentionally).

I thought about that, but AFAICS a heavily used sequence would merely
end up as a single hot entry in the shared buffer arena (or at worst,
an often-hit page in kernel buffers). It could not result in a lot of
actual I/O because it's only one page; at most one would expect one
write per checkpoint cycle. So putting it on particularly fast disk
would be a useless exercise.

regards, tom lane