From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>, "pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: aliases break my query |
Date: | 2000-05-31 02:04:12 |
Message-ID: | 3934731C.C2D35105@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
> At one time Bruce had made some patches to emit informative notice
> messages about implicit FROM entries, but that got turned off again
> for reasons that I forget...
It was triggered with common cases from the "outer join" syntax. It took
a while to track down since it was introduced while I was working on the
syntax feature :(
If it *really* needs to be put back in, then we should do so with a flag
so we can disable the warning at compile time, run time, and/or in the
outer join parser area. But imho sprinkling the parser with warnings for
allowed syntax is heading the wrong direction. If it is legal, allow it.
If it is illegal, disallow it. If it is confusing for some, but works
fine for others, it shouldn't become "sort of legal" with a warning.
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2000-05-31 02:23:27 | Announce: Release of PyGreSQL version 3.0 |
Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2000-05-31 01:53:01 | Re: Full text indexing preformance! (long) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | SL Baur | 2000-05-31 04:31:23 | Re: Pg/PLSQL Errors!! |
Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2000-05-31 01:49:51 | Re: does the' text' type cann't store more than 20,000char ? |