Re: Use of index in 7.0 vs 6.5

From: Ryan Bradetich <ryan_bradetich(at)hp(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Use of index in 7.0 vs 6.5
Date: 2000-05-30 23:48:42
Message-ID: 3934535A.E971F988@hp.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Tom Lane wrote:

> Ryan Bradetich <ryan_bradetich(at)hp(dot)com> writes:
> > This worked great! Is their a place I can change the default to 3?
> > I do not want to change all the scripts to include this :)
>
> See src/include/optimizer/cost.h. However, I am currently thinking of
> taking Hiroshi's advice instead. Lowering RANDOM_PAGE_COST seems like
> a bad idea --- if anything, we might want to raise it ;-)
>
> >>>> Or how about changing current fudge factor ?
> >>>> For example,from 0.5 to 0.2 which is the fudge factor of attdisbursion
> >>>> calculation.
> >>
> >> Yes, that's another way --- and probably more defensible than changing
> >> random_page_cost, now that I think about it. Unfortunately it's a
> >> hardwired constant and so not as easily experimented with :-(.
>
> > Can you give me more information about this? I do not have a problem
> > re-compiling the database and performing more testing if you would like.
>
> The fudge factor in question is currently 0.5, and is used in two places
> in src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c (looks like lines 193 and 212 in 7.0
> sources). I was thinking of dropping it to 0.25 or 0.1.
>
> regards, tom lane

Tom and Hiroshi,

I modified the backend to 0.1 and this has been working great! Thanks
again for the suggestion, and I'll let you know if we run into a problem.

Thanks again!

Ryan

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message xu hai 2000-05-31 01:11:16 does the' text' type cann't store more than 20,000char ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-30 21:36:36 Re: Function-based index not used in a simple query