From: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gunnar R|nning <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no> |
Cc: | Erich <hh(at)cyberpass(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql usage clip. |
Date: | 2000-05-30 12:10:13 |
Message-ID: | 3933AFA5.5AE0612A@greatbridge.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Gunnar,
Great Bridge has been running PostgreSQL against several of the leading
commercial contenders in some professional benchmarks (TPC-C, TPC-D, AS3AP),
and will be releasing the findings in June. I think people here will be very
happy with the results... :)
Regards,
Ned Lilly
VP, Hacker Relations
Great Bridge, LLC
Gunnar R|nning wrote:
> Erich <hh(at)cyberpass(dot)net> writes:
>
> > What an insulting article! They say that PostgreSQL is "equal" in
> > efficiency to MS SQL. The rest of it was pretty good, though.
>
> And Oracle. I would love to see more "neutral" performance tests between
> databases though. I suppose MS SQL could be could good for somethings as it
> is based on the code bought from Sybase.
>
> Still, the effiency can be a lot of things. I like PostgreSQL mainly
> because I can develop and deploy applications in a cost efficient way with
> it. But this equation will ofcourse depend on your organizations demands
> and skills.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gunnar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Eugene Karpachov | 2000-05-30 12:40:23 | Re: grant select,update - bug or feature? |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-05-30 11:49:01 | Re: lots of large objects and toast |