From: | Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | UNDER syntax |
Date: | 2000-05-24 10:16:21 |
Message-ID: | 392BABF5.7B8E3D4E@bitmead.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Do people interpret this syntax to mean that you can only have an UNDER
clause when using the OF <user-defined type> clause as well?
<table definition> ::=
CREATE [ <table scope> ] TABLE <table name>
<table contents source>
[ ON COMMIT <table commit action> ROWS ]
<table contents source> ::=
<table element list>
| OF <user-defined type>
[ <subtable clause> ]
[ <table element list> ]
<subtable clause> ::=
UNDER <supertable clause>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2000-05-24 10:29:39 | Re: \dS and \df <pattern> crashing psql |
Previous Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2000-05-24 10:10:06 | Re: Re: yowch: dumpRules(): SELECT failed for table website. |