Re: SQL3 UNDER


> I'll try to provide examples later. For now, did you see the gif
> attachments on a earlier message of mine?

I didn't before, but I do now.

> The UNDER and CLONES/INHERITS gif pictures
> provide a graphical view of what I mean. UNDER creates tree hierarchy
> down vertically, while INHERITS supports multiple inheritance in a
> lateral direction. The UNDER trees can be under any table that is part
> of an INHERITS relationship. UNDER and INHERITS work at different
> levels sorta. A subtable in an UNDER hierarchy can't be in an INHERITS > clause because it is logically just part of its maximal supertable. In
> other words, INHERITS can provide a relationship between different
> whole trees created by UNDER, by way of a maximal supertable being
> inherited by another maximal supertable with its own
> UNDER tree. Make any sense? :-)

I'm afraid not. Show me the (SQL) code :-).