Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Looking at the code, I understand that what your patch is doing is
> making the zeroth case no longer a special one but rather handled it in
> the same loop block as the other cases, which is why the bug is fixed.
> LGTM.
Thanks for looking! With the time constraint being what it is,
the more eyes on the patch the better.
regards, tom lane