From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | SAKAIDA Masaaki <sakaida(at)psn(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgbash-2.1 released |
Date: | 2000-05-20 18:06:42 |
Message-ID: | 3926D432.C248745F@wgcr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > > Please let me report that pgbash-2.1 was released.
> > > > (Pgbash is a tool which can execute SQL directly with using all
> > > > the functions of a bash shell. And Pgbash has functionality
> > > > which is similar to psql.)
> > > > * Download Page
> > > > http://www.psn.co.jp/PostgreSQL/pgbash/download-e.html
> > > Hello Masaaki. Could we consider packaging pgbash into our postgres
> > > RPMs for Linux? That would make it available on a *lot* more
> > > installations, and would be a very nice addition to the RPMs.
> > Yes, please :-). I'm glad you like it.
> Lamar, how about it? Packaging it completely separately (as, say,
> pgbash-2.1-1.i386.rpm) seems to make it hard to match up with other
> postgres-related RPMs. Does postgresql-pgbash-xxx work, or should we
> keep it separate? The version number is a problem if we merge it
> directly into the postgresql rpm set.
I'll take a look at it -- it seems to be a nice interface.
We currently have a similar problem with pgaccess, as its version
nnumbers are not in sync with the main release. We simply ignore that
difference -- but, pgaccess is a part of the core tarball.
I am open to suggestions -- I could make a 'postgresql-pgbash21-7.0'
series..... Kindof hokey name, though, IYKWIM.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | christopher baus | 2000-05-21 21:54:53 | date format question. |
Previous Message | Tomasz Brzezina | 2000-05-19 17:55:02 | importing from other dbases |