| From: | Richard Smith <ozric(at)tampabay(dot)rr(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql OO Patch |
| Date: | 2000-05-20 14:32:02 |
| Message-ID: | 3926A1E2.7C05B3A5@tampabay.rr.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Chris wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > It's kinda fuzzy, but in practice I'd say the readers of pgsql-hackers
> > and maybe pgsql-general.
--snip--
So it's not just me, I was using examples from Oracal 8 and was have
trouble. I started thinking, I was just missing something or maybe
just to new to SQL.
Ricahrd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-20 14:41:53 | Re: rules on INSERT can't UPDATE new instance? |
| Previous Message | Louis-David Mitterrand | 2000-05-20 13:47:10 | access to mailing list archives broken |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-20 14:41:53 | Re: rules on INSERT can't UPDATE new instance? |
| Previous Message | Louis-David Mitterrand | 2000-05-20 13:44:17 | Re: rules on INSERT can't UPDATE new instance? |