| From: | Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OO / fe-be protocol |
| Date: | 2000-05-20 08:48:47 |
| Message-ID: | 3926516F.513E24D4@bitmead.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not a Corba guru (at the moment anyway...) so someone else might be
> able to offer a more-informed opinion here.
Ok, I'll go back to reading about Corba and see if I can figure out if
it can do the job.
> (Or we could do neither, instead inventing a brand-new protocol that's
> still Postgres-only, but that seems like it has no particular
> attraction... there's a lot of work invested in the current frontends
> and if we're going to throw it away we probably ought to adopt a
> standards-based protocol. IMHO anyway.)
But if Corba is not appropriate, what else is there?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Louis-David Mitterrand | 2000-05-20 09:00:56 | rules on INSERT can't UPDATE new instance? |
| Previous Message | Chris | 2000-05-20 08:41:28 | Re: OO Patch |