Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))

From: Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: Matthias Urlichs <smurf(at)noris(dot)net>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Alessio Bragadini <alessio(at)albourne(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))
Date: 2000-05-20 00:19:00
Message-ID: 3925D9F4.284B8B3E@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Matthias Urlichs wrote:

> Another attitude of the PostgreSQL developers might be to answer "run
> VACUUM" whenever somebody reports performance problems. That answer is
> not helpful at all WRT this benchmark, because the user who caused the
> problem ("test", in my case) isn't permitted to run VACUUM on the
> pg_index table.

Speaking of which, why can't any user who can change meta-data, also
Vacuum meta-data ? It's not a threat to security is it?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2000-05-20 00:26:35 Re: OO Patch
Previous Message Chris 2000-05-20 00:15:58 Re: OO Patch

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2000-05-20 00:26:35 Re: OO Patch
Previous Message Chris 2000-05-20 00:15:58 Re: OO Patch