| From: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OO Stuff |
| Date: | 2000-05-19 06:30:26 |
| Message-ID: | 3924DF82.40D4D2EF@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > 3) Returning of sub-class fields. Any ODBMS *must* do this by
> > definition. If it doesn't, it isn't an ODBMS.
>
> Chris, you have a bad habit of defining away the problem. Not
> everyone is convinced upon this point.
Or to put things another way, my goal is to implement the ODMG
(http://www.odmg.org/) interface on postgresql. Nobody has said
*anything* like that this is a bad goal to aim for, or that there is a
better way of doing it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-05-19 06:33:35 | Re: OO Patch |
| Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-05-19 05:29:12 | Re: OO Patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-05-19 06:33:35 | Re: OO Patch |
| Previous Message | Matthias Urlichs | 2000-05-19 05:55:10 | Re: Heaps of read() syscalls by the postmaster |