From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre(dot)duquesne(at)nokia(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
Date: | 2017-08-28 12:31:26 |
Message-ID: | 3924.1503923486@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> With this change, it is quite possible that during rescans workers
> will not do any work.
Um, what's different about that than before?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-08-28 12:44:51 | Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-08-28 12:26:38 | Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-08-28 12:44:51 | Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-08-28 12:26:38 | Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90 |