Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne(dot)adam(at)nokia(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre(dot)duquesne(at)nokia(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Date: 2017-08-28 12:31:26
Message-ID: 3924.1503923486@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> With this change, it is quite possible that during rescans workers
> will not do any work.

Um, what's different about that than before?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-08-28 12:44:51 Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-08-28 12:26:38 Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-08-28 12:44:51 Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-08-28 12:26:38 Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90