Re: Casting, again

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Casting, again
Date: 2000-05-16 01:21:43
Message-ID: 3920A2A7.74282EF7@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> If implicit conversions can only follow specific "promotability" links
> then we don't have this risk.

We've had some evolution in how we do type coersion and conversion,
and istm that we are about ready to take the next step. Before, there
were only a few folks thinking about it, and we implemented some steps
to test out new ideas without making fundamental changes outside the
parser. Now, we can make some more improvements based on experience
with the current system.

I like the idea of having some table-driven rules for implicit type
coersion, since that technique can extend to user-defined types. The
issues we have regarding string types and numeric types need to be
thought through in the context of having *more* string types, which
afaik is how we are going to integrate multibyte character sets into
basic Postgres.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael A. Olson 2000-05-16 01:29:53 Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-16 01:15:19 Re: Berkeley DB license terms (was Re: Proposal...)