Re: 7.0 RPM?

From: Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)range(dot)infoplease(dot)com>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)range(dot)infoplease(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, karl(at)debisschop(dot)net, "J(dot) Atwood" <jatwood(at)bwanazulia(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.0 RPM?
Date: 2000-05-10 14:14:14
Message-ID: 39196EB6.8CA5F7AA@alert.infoplease.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > > 7.0RC5 is database-compatible with the final, earlier betas are *not*.
> > > You can use pg_upgrade to update from any 6.5-or-later version if you
> > > are feeling adventurous, but I'd definitely suggest making a backup
> > > first in case things go wrong and you have to initdb and restore.
> > Sorry if I was not clear. The RPMs I prepared use Lamar Owen spec from RC1,
> > but use final release sources. Upgrading from final release to final release
> > should not be a problem, I think. I only recommended it because I understand
> > from his recent posts sthat Lamar has many inprovements to the RPM install
> > script that I have not taken advantage of.
>
> Tom's point is that RC5 is *not* database-compatible with previous
> release candidates due to a last minute bug fix in the location of
> group table indices.
>
> So anything earlier than RC5 needs (at least) a pg_upgrade, and (for
> me) preferably a full dump/initdb/restore cycle.
>
> - Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
> South Pasadena, California

My point is that my RPMS use the final release sources

Karl

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-05-10 14:23:30 Re: pgsql/php3/apache authentication
Previous Message Ned Lilly 2000-05-10 14:11:22 Re: Steering committee responce to Great Bridge LLC

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert B. Easter 2000-05-10 14:22:06 Re: Primary Key on Inherited Table
Previous Message Michael Robinson 2000-05-10 14:08:19 Multibyte still broken