| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip |
| Date: | 2025-02-14 23:03:50 |
| Message-ID: | 3915749.1739574230@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Here's a patch. Is there a tidier way to write this?
Hmm, I think not with the current set of primitives. We could think
about refactoring them, but that's not a job for a band-aid patch.
> It should probably be back-patched to 17, because external code might
> use per-buffer data (obviously v17 core doesn't or skink would have
> told us this sooner). It's not a good time to push to 17 today,
> though. Push to master now to cheer skink up and 17 some time later
> when the coast is clear, or just wait?
Agreed that right now is a bad time to push this to v17 --- we need to
keep the risk factors as low as possible for the re-release. Master
now and v17 after the re-wrap seems like the right compromise.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-02-14 23:06:23 | Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2025-02-14 22:54:17 | Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip |