From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Sverre H(dot) Huseby" <sverrehu(at)online(dot)no>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: So we're in agreement.... |
Date: | 2000-05-07 07:27:01 |
Message-ID: | 39151AC5.7D570921@tm.ee |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> So, we're going to go with less security then is available on most Unix
> OSs?
No, the general consensus seems to be using MD5, not the weaker DES
crypt.
> if we are going to do this, *please* just use the regular system
> crypt() function ... for those that are using MD5 for their passwords, at
> least as it is under FreeBSD, crypt() does either MD5 or DES depending on
> the system ...
What does it do to portbility ?
-----------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ramses v. Pinxteren | 2000-05-07 07:39:46 | mod_auth_pg95 |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-05-07 07:21:56 | Re: So we're in agreement.... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-05-07 07:40:35 | minor psql errors in RC5 |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-05-07 07:21:56 | Re: So we're in agreement.... |