Re: So we're in agreement....

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Sverre H(dot) Huseby" <sverrehu(at)online(dot)no>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So we're in agreement....
Date: 2000-05-07 07:27:01
Message-ID: 39151AC5.7D570921@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> So, we're going to go with less security then is available on most Unix
> OSs?

No, the general consensus seems to be using MD5, not the weaker DES
crypt.

> if we are going to do this, *please* just use the regular system
> crypt() function ... for those that are using MD5 for their passwords, at
> least as it is under FreeBSD, crypt() does either MD5 or DES depending on
> the system ...

What does it do to portbility ?

-----------
Hannu

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ramses v. Pinxteren 2000-05-07 07:39:46 mod_auth_pg95
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2000-05-07 07:21:56 Re: So we're in agreement....

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2000-05-07 07:40:35 minor psql errors in RC5
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2000-05-07 07:21:56 Re: So we're in agreement....