Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> I have to admit that these inconsistencies are a pet peeve of mine. I
> find them distracting, and have a history of fixing them on an ad-hoc
> basis. But there are real practical arguments in favor of being strict
> about it as a matter of policy -- it's not *just* neatnikism.
I agree, this has always been a pet peeve of mine as well. I would
have guessed there were fewer examples than you found, because I've
generally fixed any such cases I happened to notice.
regards, tom lane