Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date: 2000-05-05 15:36:01
Message-ID: 3912EA61.67FE9646@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I'm sorry to inconveniece you.
> In addition I have to mention that I gave up to confirm sgml format myself.
> I apologize again that I have inconvenienced you.

No, it is better to have the right info *somewhere* than to wait to
put it in later. Even if I miss something now, it will be correct next
time, which is the best thing.

Regards.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-05 15:41:30 Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Previous Message Mitch Vincent 2000-05-05 15:32:11 Re: Indexing varchar fields with lower()