From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Splitting libpq build |
Date: | 2021-10-03 20:35:14 |
Message-ID: | 3912144.1633293314@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 3:11 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Having said that, it does work on non-Windows machines to do
>> ./configure ...
>> cd src/interfaces/libpq
>> make -s install
> Well, asking people to download the whole source tree just to build
> client library 1000 times and then 1000 times delete the source code...
Uh ... why are you installing from source at all, if that's your
use-case? Most major distributions provide packages that subdivide
Postgres into client and server packages, and usually there's even
a package with just the library(s).
> So instead of simplifying the life of maintainers in the different distros
> you made the life easier for yourself. ;;-)
Well, yeah. Packaging is a different business. And, having *been*
a packager for Red Hat for a decade, it's not like I've never heard
of it. But I don't see anything we need to do differently there.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Igor Korot | 2021-10-03 21:10:46 | Re: Splitting libpq build |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2021-10-03 20:28:55 | Re: Splitting libpq build |