Re: Open items

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>> We only have a few open items left. Can we finish them so we can move
>>> toward final release?

The list seems to be nearly down to this:

>>> Rename dump GUC variable to be more generic
>>
>> Sure, if we can agree on a name.

> We have a few options here. Currently it is "check_function_bodies".
> The ideas were validation mode:
>> I think I'd prefer to keep foreign key check disabling separate. Or at
>> least make it separately selectable. Maybe validation_mode could have
>> multiple levels ("off", "safe", "risky")?
> and an even more generic "restore_mode" where the restore_mode could
> control even more things, such as doing an ANALYZE before an ALTER TABLE
> ADD CONSTRAINT.

Given the apparent lack of interest in this topic, I propose that we
just leave the variable name as-is.

regards, tom lane