Re: postgresql newsgroups

From: mr_hopkins(at)earthlink(dot)net (Micheal H(dot))
To: pgsql-questions(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql newsgroups
Date: 2000-02-17 06:50:55
Message-ID: 38ab9c23.4017753@news.earthlink.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I agree completely. Also these group send back an email to posts that
they don't reconize as coming from someone who as subscribed to the
group which I have. There really doesn't seem to be enough posting to
warrent all of those different groups.

by the way, can i access my postgresql database using perl running on
WinNT, how? thanks!

On 17 Feb 2000 05:50:29 +1050, jamesbinary(at)icqmail(dot)com (James) wrote:

>My ISP's newserver carries the following postresql groups:
>
>comp.databases.postgresql
>comp.databases.postgresql.bugs
>comp.databases.postgresql.docs
>comp.databases.postgresql.hackers
>comp.databases.postgresql.patches
>comp.databases.postgresql.questions
>
>The trouble is that there are hardly any articles coming into these groups.
>
>Is the bulk of user generated information about postgresql in mailing
>lists? (I'm subscribe to too many already)
>
>I can't understand why there are so few messages about a free database
>package.
>
>And if this isn't too inflamatory a question, where does postgresql stand
>in comparison to MySql and DB2? (both of which aren't free I believe).

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nemeth Miklos 2000-02-17 08:52:47 Re: [GENERAL] splitting tables into db's
Previous Message Louis Bertrand 2000-02-17 04:52:59 Re: [GENERAL] ownership of DBs and tables?